Proponents claims that GE fish will help meet the world’s growing demand for seafood — but it may be that the costs to ocean and human health far outweigh any potential benefit.
Right now, the FDA, under the agency's authority to review "new animal drugs,"i is considering whether to allow the production and sale of the first-ever genetically engineered animal for human consumption. AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. wants commercial approval of its AquAdvantage salmon, a farmed Atlantic salmon genetically engineered to grow twice as fast as natural salmon. The company claims that its fish will help meet the world’s growing demand for seafoodii—but it may be that the costs to ocean and human health far outweigh any potential benefit.
If the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approve the first genetically engineered animal for human consumption a new breed of farmed fish may soon be at your local grocer or seafood restaurant without you even recognizing it. If GE fish technology proliferates before we have answers to a host of critical questions, we'll be gambling with the health of our oceans, the economic well-being of our coastal communities and the safety of our seafood supply.
The environmental consequences of farming genetically engineered fish, including salmon, are not fully understood—but what is known is troubling. We know that farmed fish can escape their enclosures, whether they are in land-based tanks or ocean-based net pens.iii Escaped genetically engineered salmon are likely to compete with wild fish, including endangered Atlantic salmon, for habitat, food, and mates.iv Research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that the release of just 60 genetically engineered fish into a wild population of 60,000 could lead to the extinction of the wild population in less than 40 generations.v There is still considerable debate about whether this "Trojan gene effect" would occur if AquaBounty's genetically engineered salmon escape. But the company's data, and FDA's conclusions based on analysis of that information, indicate that up to 5 percent of the eggs may not be sterile.vi
Growing genetically engineered salmon in contained, land-based facilities, the initial step being considered by the FDA, does not alleviate these concerns. Some re-circulated water is eventually released into the environment, providing an escape route for genetically modified fish or eggs. Land-based facilities are also subject to natural disasters, human error, or intentional sabotage. The New Animal Drug Application process used by the FDA does not fully address the scope of the environmental damage that could result should genetically engineered salmon or salmon eggs escape containment.vii
Beyond the environmental concerns of genetically engineered fish, the limited data made public by the company suggest that the product may pose food safety concerns as well. These concerns must be thoroughly evaluated before genetically engineered salmon is approved for human consumption. Some of the differences between genetically engineered salmon and conventional salmon include:viii
The decision before the FDA could have consequences that go well beyond salmon. An FDA decision will mark a critical turning point for the future of our seafood supply. Should genetically engineered salmon be approved, it will be nearly impossible to reverse course once the "genie is out of the bottle," especially if labeling is not required. Approval could pave the way for the proliferation of other species of genetically engineered fish and, in so doing, fundamentally alter the nature of our seafood supply.
Our ocean is our life support system, and a bountiful wild fish supply is one of its most precious resources. Over a billion people rely on fish as their primary source of protein,xvi and billions more value fish for sport and tourism. Wild fisheries also produce enormous economic benefits to coastal communities and throughout the economy estimated at more than $90 billion each year.xvii Decisions about the future of fish farming – including the role of genetically engineered fish – should not be made in isolation, or in ways that threaten the health of our ocean.
Ocean Conservancy is calling for a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement before a decision is made on genetically engineered salmon. And we are calling for mandatory labeling of any genetically engineered fish or genetically engineered fish product sold to U.S. consumers. Only then will consumers have the information they need to avoid it in the marketplace if they so choose.
Learn how you can help us maintain America’s world-class fisheries for fish and fishermen.
Decisions about the future of fish farming – including the role of genetically engineered fish – should not be made in isolation, or in ways that threaten the health of our ocean.
The FDA is determining whether to allow the sale of the first genetically engineered animal for human consumption. Here's what you need to know.